You have an incompetent employee. You attempt to correct his/her behavior. The employee refused to alter the behavior. You publicly shame them, once, twice, maybe three times. The employee continues to perform inadequately. At what point does the supervisor become liable, civilly, for the misbehavior?
You see it in the private sector many times. Serial harassers, embezzlers, abusers continue their behavior without repercussions and the employer held responsible for not taking forcible corrective action at some point, usually in the form of fines in the millions.
So if someone publicly berates a commander more than a few times at a CompStat meeting, attempts to make them correct aberrant behavior, tries to make them live up to what is expected by the upper echelon, time and time again. Yet nothing is accomplished and no one is demoted, when does the Superintendent become liable for each and every shooting, rape, robbery and murder in the district because he left a demonstrably incompetent boob in charge who refused to do what was expected and demanded of him?
We're just wondering.
You see it in the private sector many times. Serial harassers, embezzlers, abusers continue their behavior without repercussions and the employer held responsible for not taking forcible corrective action at some point, usually in the form of fines in the millions.
So if someone publicly berates a commander more than a few times at a CompStat meeting, attempts to make them correct aberrant behavior, tries to make them live up to what is expected by the upper echelon, time and time again. Yet nothing is accomplished and no one is demoted, when does the Superintendent become liable for each and every shooting, rape, robbery and murder in the district because he left a demonstrably incompetent boob in charge who refused to do what was expected and demanded of him?
We're just wondering.