On Behalf Of Mr. Hudak

Since Mr. Hudak rambled on 87 bunny trails and confused his closest supporters, I will help make his points.
Mr. Hudak really meant to tell y'all that he really wanted to make this election about 1 simple thing: the economy.  Mr. McGuinty brags about massive spending programs to help the economy.  Mr. Hudak intended to tell you that the entire Liberal tax and spend agenda is about class warfare and redistribution.  He intended to articulate clearly that governments have no business running and planning the economy.  Mr. Hudak really thinks we the people of Ontario should fight through tough times and the government should get out of the way, not dive in and spend, create, and waste. 
The Liberals justify damaging our children's future with a suffocating debt load because the 'here and now' relief of pain trumps core values like: personal responsibility, consequences to choices and fighting through adversity.

Mr. Hudak intended to clearly communicate that his sole mission will be to lower debt and limit government intervention in the economy.  There will be some pain since we are not allowing debt to pacify our instant cries.  But that is okay.  A 3 year old who freaks out because they do not get a second bowl of ice cream is really learning a valuable lesson...limits are imposed on us for our benefit, despite the immediate pain of not getting our way.  Debt and program spending is Dalton's way to give that screaming child the extra bowl...after all, the cries never stop.   

Mr. Hudak intended to have the backbone to stand behind this message.  He foreknew there would be incredible backlash and really planned to have a response: a logical argument as to how his conservative principles truly value people and families.

He meant to stay the course, I'm sure of it.  So, in lieu of Mr. Hudak going off course and likely blowing the election, I encourage you with his logical questions and responses on what should have been the only topic he opened his mouth on. 

The State Will Rule You (Because You Can't Think For Yourself!)

Host a Bible Study, Get a Fine

San Juan Capistrano homeowners Chuck and Stephanie Fromm were fined $300 for holding a Bible study in their own home and were told by officials that ongoing gatherings of three or more people require a conditional use permit. The Fromms were warned that they would be fined $500 per meeting if they continued to hold the Bible studies.

"We not only have the First Amendment of the Constitution on our side, but we also have the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, which we at the Pacific Justice Institute have used effectively on many, many cases."

   


In order for the left to get your money, they must first undermine the rights you have with your property, articulating your beliefs and the fruit of your labour. Rights of the individual always get put behind the 'collective group'.




"These are uncertain times for the global

economy. These are challenging times

for our families. This is our plan to help.

This is our way forward, together.”

     














That's right, we move forward together. Your results don't matter to you, as much as they matter to Mr. McGuinty.  He needs the success of the free market to drive his agenda of a 'everyone loves everyone, share the wealth Ontario'.  Undermining our property rights, free speech and earnings is a basic way the left seeks to use slight of hand to build the economy.

And on that note, how are we doing Mr. McGuinty?
Need more taxpayer dollars and more then the 200 billion debt to peruse your agenda of togetherness?

Typically not a good idea to undermine capital and the free markets, Mr. McGuinty. 
A warning for Captain Togetherness: if you execute your plan of government propped up economic growth, the economy will suffer. Be warned. If you tease and poke at the free market like you are proposing to do, she will leave us and go elsewhere...don't annoy her with your 'togetherness' talk: it will have the opposite impact you intend. 

Conclusion:
The two issues discussed are connected: we need to fundamentally understand our property rights and hold fast to our convictions of liberty.  Standing on that podium, we declare that we own the fruit of our labour and no government can force me to give up my earnings for excessive 'togetherness-utopia' spending.
Enough is enough.